Screening Tools

If we are to prevent "something," our 1st step is to recognize who might be involved in this  "something".............therefore to prevent postpartum depression we must first recognize or identify those women "at risk"  

There are numerous screening instruments/tools available for healthcare professionals 

Each tool is designed to identify women who are at risk for developing postpartum depression

Healthcare professional should select an  instrument/tool that:

Is simple, easy for the participant to complete

Is reliable and replicable

Is appropriate for and reflective of the population being evaluated

The earliest tool was developed by Braverman & Roux in 1978

The authors used their clinical intuition and psychopathology knowledge of the day to develop the tool

Initially the tool was a 19-item, yes/no,  self-administered questionnaire

Revised by authors after identifying 6 questions with the best predictive value

This shortened version of the questionnaire has a:

Specificity of 85%

Sensitivity of 94%

 

In 1984 Pietrick introduced a 2nd tool 

Again it was based on the literature of the day

The author identified 16 risk factors:

Anxiety regarding pregnancy

Support from other pregnant women or women with infants

Emotional support of partner/family

Was this an unplanned pregnancy

Readiness to assume role of parent

Depression history

Recent major life changes

Difficulty making changes

Fear of illness

Concerns with body image/changes with pregnancy

Relationship with own mother

Planned to breastfeed

Family history of psychiatric illnesses

Sadness and/or changing emotions at 3 points in time--premenstrual, while taking birth control pills, with previous pregnancies

Again it was a simple, yes/no, self-administered  questionnaire

The author suggests that women who answer yes to most of the questions potentially are at high risk for postpartum depression

There is no published data on how predictive the tool is

 

Six (6) years later in 1990,  Boyer, Van Der Leden and Bacom published their tool

Also using the literature of the day, the authors identified 16 risk factors--combining previously identified risk factors with new ones: 

Changing emotions around menstrual periods

Prenatal anxiety

Prenatal depression

Unhappy childhood

Support from family

Support from friends

Feeling unloved by partner

Regret(s) about current pregnancy

Previous postpartum depression

History of mental illness

Past emotional problems

Lack of control over own life

Nervous or worried a great deal

Angry about own life situation

Self-fault when bad things happen

Financial, housing and/or other personal problems

Again it was a simple, yes/no, self-administered  questionnaire

The authors considered women:

"At risk" if they identified 3-6 risk factors 

At "high risk" if they identified > 6 risk factors 

There is no published data on how predictive the tool is

 

The Antenatal Screening Questionnaire (ASQ) was published by Appleby, Gregoire, Platz, Prince & Kumar in 1994

Based on the research of one of the authors it is a 10-item tool assessing risk factors in the areas of:

Psychiatric history

Prenatal worries

Unwanted pregnancy

Life stress

Social support

It was a self-administered  questionnaire

For 8 of the questions a Likert-type scale, ranging from 0-3, was used

For the remaining 2 items, the choice was yes/no scoring either zero (0) or 1

Initially the tool predicted 44% of the women who would eventually experience postpartum depression

There are no data available re: cutoff score for the number of risk factors nor score for the scale

 

Stamp, Williams & Crowther modified Appleby et al publishing the Modified Antenatal Screening Questionnaire (MASQ) in 1996

It assesses the woman's:

Current relationship with partner

Problem-solving style

Availability of family/friend support systems

Previous psychiatric history

It is a self-administered 9-item Likert-type scale 

Scores for each item ranged from 0-2

An overall score of > 2 was used as predictive of postpartum depression

The authors also included the 25-item Crown Crisp Experiential Index (Crown & Crisp, 1979) which evaluated anxiety

Receipt of a score of 10 on the Crown Crisp Experiential Index was weighted as a score of 2 on the MASQ 

This alone was accepted as predictive of postpartum depression

As a predictor of major depression the MASQ had a:

Specificity of 43%

Sensitivity of 73%

As a predictor of minor depression the MASQ had a:

Specificity of 48%

Sensitivity of 81%

The authors concluded their tool was reliable in only predicting minor depression

 

In 1997 Posner, Unterman, Williams and Williams published the Antepartum Questionnaire (APQ) which they had developed in 2 phases/studies

1st phase/study

Women in their 2nd trimester of pregnancy completed a self-administered 61-item questionnaire based on the literature of the day and previous studies conducted by the authors

Next the women were interviewed and administered the Beck Depression Inventory:

At time of delivery (while still hospitalized)

At 4-6 weeks postpartum

At 12 weeks postpartum

Based on data analysis, 23 of the original 61 items were kept, as well as one item from the demographic information

These 24 items became the APQ focusing on the woman's:

Education

Socioeconomic status

Marital status

Relationships with her mother, father, and  husband/boyfriend

Pregnancy and medical history

Social support systems

Early family life

Self-esteem

History of postpartum depression

Anxiety during pregnancy

Sadness during pregnancy

22 of the 24 items are Likert-type questions with scores ranging from 0-6

Final score is obtained by adding the value for all 24 items

2nd phase/study

Women in their 2nd trimester of pregnancy completed the 24-item self-administered questionnaire

Again, the women were interviewed and administered the Beck Depression Inventory:

At time of delivery (while still hospitalized)

At 4-6 weeks postpartum

At 12 weeks postpartum

The authors performed a retrospective data analysis from the 1st study and prospective data analysis from the 2nd study

Using a cut off score of 46, the tool was predictive with a:

Specificity of 78% and Sensitivity of 82% with the 1st study

Specificity of 82% and Sensitivity of 80% with the 2nd study

Highly Predictive items were:  

An unstable relationship with her partner 

Woman's perception of past or current non- availability of loving, caring parents

Significantly Predictive items were:

History of emotional instability, including previous postpartum depression

Poor self-esteem

Insufficient income

Satisfaction with educational preparation

The authors concluded any woman with a score of > 46 should be referred for psychiatric evaluation prior to delivery and followed closely during the postpartum period

 

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

10-item Likert-type scale

Select from 1 of 4 statements

Mom self-reports feelings for the last week

Instructed to select answer which closest reflects feeling in the past 7 days

Takes 5-10 minutes to complete

Some mothers need assistance in understanding answer choices as colloquialisms are European in origin

Maximum score is 30

Score of > 10 indicates possible depression of varying severity

If results doubtful, may be re-administered after 2 weeks

EPDS will not detect

Anxiety disorders

Phobia

Personality disorders

Positive predictive value of 93%  with a:

Specificity of 99%   (One source indicated 78%)

Sensitivity of 78%   (One source indicated 86%)

 

Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS)

Self administered, 35-item Likert-type scale focusing on woman's feelings for the last 2 weeks postpartum

Written on third-grade reading level

Items are brief and easy to understand

Takes 5-10 minutes to complete

Answer choices range from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"

Assesses postpartum depression symptoms in seven (7) areas

Sleeping/Eating disturbances

Anxiety/Insecurity

Emotional lability

Mental confusion

Loss of self

Guilt/Shame

Suicidal thoughts

Provides an overall severity score in one of three ranges

Normal adjustment

Significant symptoms of postpartum depression

Positive screen for major postpartum depression

Positive predictive value of 90%  with a:

Specificity of 98%

Sensitivity of 94%

 

Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory (PDPI)

This tool was developed Beck in 1998

Inventory checklist consisting of 8 risk factors: 

Prenatal depression

Prenatal anxiety

History of previous depression

Social support

Marital satisfaction

Life stress

Child care stress

Maternity blues

This is not a self-report questionnaire, rather it requires a healthcare professional to interview the woman

May be administered either prenatally or during postpartum period

Originally developed from the findings of two meta-analyses on postpartum depression risk factors

Author recommended periodic revision to include

Additional risk factors

Current research reported in the literature

Deletion of risk factors no longer relevant

 

PDPI-Revised

As suggested by the author, the tool was revised to keep it current and relevant

 In 2001 Beck identified 13 significant risk factors:

Prenatal depression

Prenatal anxiety

History of previous depression

Self-esteem

Socioeconomic status

Social support

Life stress

Marital status

Marital satisfaction

Unwanted/unplanned pregnancy

Child care stress

Infant temperament

Maternity " blues"

The 1st 10 risk factors (prenatal depression through unwanted/unplanned pregnancy) can be assessed both prenatally and or during postpartum period

The last 3 risk factors (child care stress through maternity "blues") can be assessed during postpartum period

Highly Predictive items were:

Self-esteem

Prenatal depression

Child care stress

Weakest predictive item was:  Unwanted/unplanned pregnancy

As with the original tool, the PDPI-Revised is not a self-report questionnaire, rather it requires a healthcare professional to interview the woman

Revised tool does not provide an overall or cutoff score, rather it indicates individual risk factors

This allows for specific planned nursing interventions

Author recommends those women identified "at risk" prenatally be referred for telephone and home visits, if possible, following delivery

Development of a self-administered version of the tool is under way

Remember, the presence of risk factors only indicates there is an increased probability the woman may develop postpartum depression.....it does not guarantee she will

If a tool is used to identify women "at risk" for postpartum depression, mechanisms and processes need to be in place to respond................

 

Back Next